![]() Carbon capture is designed to make us feel relieved about the world-saving technology just around the corner. And for many voters, it has an intuitive rhetorical appeal: Who wouldn’t want to “capture” carbon pollution?įor the fossil fuel industry, the appeal of CCS is more complicated - and dangerous. So why does carbon capture maintain its trendy status as a bipartisan climate fix? For Democrats frustrated by their inability to pass more meaningful climate legislation, carbon capture has the allure of doing, well, something. Even the world’s largest carbon direct air capture facility that’s currently under construction is expected to remove only 0.0001 percent of the CO2 emitted globally per year. The most high-profile CCS projects in the country have been multibillion-dollar failures. From there it can be sent somewhere to be safely stored, or perhaps even repurposed.īut despite billions of dollars and decades of effort invested, no such facilities exist on any meaningful scale. The popular image of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) - promoted by the fossil fuel industry, politicians and techno-futurists alike - is a power plant equipped with devices that can grab the spewing pollution before it reaches the atmosphere.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |